
Research on Internet Use in Education
Goals for Internet Use in EducationThe ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (NETS) profile expectations for technology use by students. The following examples identify some Internet-related expectations for students in elementary and middle schools (International Society for Technology in Education, 1998).
Many individual states have developed Information Technology in Education standards that include similar expectations (Developing Educational Standards). As with the ISTE NETS, often the expectations are that students have developed substantial Internet skills by the time they finish the eighth grade, and that they then routinely practice these skills while in high school. The U.S. Federal Government and many state governments have decided that all students should have convenient access to the Internet. A number of federal programs have helped to fund implementation (Four Pillars). Federal aid to networking and other aspects of telecommunications is currently providing approximately one-third of all of the funds going into IT in PreK-12 education (E-Rate). School reform and school renewal models vary from back-to-basics to a heavy emphasis on the thorough integration of IT throughout curriculum, instruction, and assessment (Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory). Even in most back-to-basics types of school reform models there is recognition that the Internet brings a new dimension to communicating over time and distance and that students need to develop basic skills in its use. Many school reform models focus on a significant restructuring of the classroom and providing students with routine Internet connectivity both in their classrooms and at home. An extreme example of this is provided by laptop computer projects in which each student has a laptop and connectivity to use at home and school (Rockman et al). In brief summary, the Internet plays four roles in school improvement and reform models:
Digital Library AccessOne measure of the quality of an education system is the nature and extent of the information that it makes available to students. Guidelines for school libraries and textbook selections assist in maintaining a high standard. These resources along with the teachers knowledge have traditionally been the dominant sources of information for all curricula. Internet access is changing this paradigm. A student can have access to a library that is hundreds of times as extensive as the school library. In addition, they gain access to computer-assisted learning and distance education aids to learning. Students can easily access up-to-date information that is not in the textbook and that is not familiar to the teacher. It is reasonable to conclude that a global library will enhance student learning. Lance (1994) provides a meta-study of the relationship between the quality of school library media centers and student achievement. This meta-study suggests the quality of a media center and the supporting staff correlates directly with student achievement. However, there is surprisingly little research in this area. A much more extensive study on this topic has recently begun under the auspices of the American Association of School Librarians (AASL). In many schools, library media specialists and regular classroom teachers now have joint responsibility in helping students learn to access information through the Internet and other sources. The Library Information Online Network (LION [Online]) Simpson (1996) are excellent sources of information for library media specialists and classroom teachers. McKenzie (1995) provides assessment rubrics covering the following seven major components of accessing information.
Communication via the InternetIt is easy to learn to use the Internet to do Email. In some sense, Email is like having a person to person telegraph systemwithout having to learn Morse code. Thus, students can begin to communicate via Email as soon as they develop rudimentary reading and writing skills. Email interaction with both local and far away friends and acquaintances can be quite motivational in improving one reading and writing skills. Of course, the Internet provides much more that the simple exchange of Email messages as an aid to communication. Here are three additional important educational uses of the Internet:
Developing Web DocumentsHypermedia that includes text, sound, graphics, video, color, and interactivity is a new form of communication. Students of all ages can learn to both read and write hypermedia. Note that we have 5,000 years of experience in teaching reading and writing of hardcopy text, and we still do not have agreement on the best way to do this. What there is an extensive literature from practitioners describing how they teach students to read and write hypermedia, we are a long way from having definitive research in this area. The Web is a unique form of hypermedia reading and writing environment. Research indicates that students benefit from learning to author Web documents (Smith, 1993). In the process of developing an effective Web site that includes text, sound, graphics, video, color, and interactivity, students develop skills that make them more effective users of Web sites. In addition, as the Web developers needs gains an awareness of technical issues such as varying download times, they learn to use the Internet for their own research uses with better results. Many of the practitioner articles about student use of the Web indicate that students are often highly motivated by the opportunity to create Web sites. Often such articles discuss ideas on students developing Web sites as part of a project-based learning assignment. IT-Assisted Project-based LearningProject-based learning (PBL) has long been a part of the repertoire of many teachers. Blumenfeld et al. (1991) provides an excellent summary of the research literature supporting PBL. In brief summary, in the hands of an appropriately prepared teacher, PBL works well and leads to increased student learning. Equally important, IT-assisted PBL provides an efficient vehicle for helping students to learn to make effective use of the Internet and to learn to attack interdisciplinary problems. IT brings a two for the price of one dimension to PBL. Students using IT in PBL learn both the IT and the disciplines being focused on in the PBL lesson. Significant gains in students learning can occur in this environment (Sandholtz et al., 1997). An IT-assisted PBL lesson has multiple goals (Moursund 1999). Four of these that are relevant to use of the Internet are quoted below.
Concerns and ConsiderationsThe Internet is not a panacea for all of the problems facing our educational system, Here are three major concerns and considerations in use of the Internet in education. 1. Inappropriate People and InformationThe Internet is an open system providing access to people and information throughout the world. Much of what can be accessed might be considered to be inappropriate for access by young students. However, there is no universally agreed upon definition of inappropriate. Standards vary from location to location and from person to person. Thus, it is not surprising that a variety of approaches are being used to address the problem. The following examples identify three widely used approaches being followed by various schools.
2. Learning the Internet Takes TimeThe research evidence indicates that both students and teachers take a significant amount of time to learn to make effective use of the Internet (Hinchliffe, 1996). Research indicates that teachers are usually surprised at how much student learning time is require before students begin to make effective use of the Internet to learn other subject areas (Department of Education). This conclusion is not surprising, and it contributes to two problems. First, the curriculum in most schools is already over crowded. Increasingly the curriculum has a focus of preparing students to do well on various tests that have little or nothing to do with using IT effectively. Second, most teachers lack the IT training and experience that is needed to make them comfortable in working with students who are routinely using the Internet and other IT. This second difficulty explains why so many research reports emphasize the need for more professional development (Presidents Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology). 3. The Digital DivideAs Internet use becomes a routine tool in business, government, and education, there is growing concern about the haves and the have nots. This is now called the Digital Divide problem. There are significant differences among various states and various school districts within states in terms of providing Internet access to students. The Digital Divide is currently an important political issue (Digital Divide Network). There are major differences between at home access to the Internet between lower income households and higher income households (Benton Foundation; National Telecommunications and Information Administration). In some school districts, well over 80-percent of students have Internet access at home. In others, under 20 percent of students have Internet access at home. In any case, teachers and schools need to make effective use of this at-home resource as part of their overall plan for helping students achieve high standards in education. As an example of what can be done, there is increasing emphasis on keeping schools open outside of the regular school hours, and using schools as community centers. This can serve as a vehicle for providing Internet access and other IT access to students who lack such access at home. Schools and the InternetThe Internet provides a valuable learning environment and can be a major vehicle for school improvement. The Internet provides students and teachers with improved access to people and information. This improved access can serve as an underpinning for significant changes in curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Ongoing professional development and substantial technical support at the school level are essential to achieving these educational improvements. ReferencesAmerican Association for School Librarians. Information power: Because Student achievement is the bottom line [Online]. Accessed: http://www.ala.org/aasl/ip_implementation.html Benton Foundation. The digital beat [Online]. Accessed: http://www.benton.org/DigitalBeat/. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, S., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., and Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist. 26(3 & 4), 369-398. Digital Divide Network [Online]. Accessed: http://www.digitaldividenetwork.org/. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Falling through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide [Online]. Accessed: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html. ERate [Online]. Accessed: http://www.ed.gov/Technology/eratemenu.html Four Pillars [Online]. Available: http://www.ed.gov/Technology/goals.html Hinchliffe, L. (1996). Helping early childhood teacher education students learn about the Internet. ERIC Digest [Online]. Accessed: http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed395714.html. IEARN. International Education and Resource Network [Online]. Accessed: http://www.iearn.org/. International Society for Technology in Education Standards Projects [Online]. Available: http://www.iste.org/standards/. Lance, K. (1994). The impact of school library media centers on academic achievement. SLMQ. 22, (3). [Online] Accessed: http://www.ala.org/aasl/SLMR/slmr_resources/select_lance.html. Library information Online Network[Online]. Accessed: http://www.libertynet.org/lion/lion.html. Logan, R.K. (1995). The fifth language: Learning a living in the computer age. Toronto, Canada: Stoddart Publishing Company. McKenzie, J. (1995). Information skills rating scale [Online]. Accessed: http://www.fno.org/libskill.html. Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory. The McREL standards database [Online]. Available: http://198.17.205.11/standards-benchmarks/. Moursund, D. (1999). Project-based learning using information technology. Eugene, OR: ISTE. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (1998). Catalog of school reform models: First edition. [Online]. Available: http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/natspec/catalog/index.html. Presidents Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology (March 1997). Report to the president on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Washington DC: Author. Responsible Netizen [Online]. Accessed: http://netizen.uoregon.edu/. Rockman et al. (2000). A more complex picture: Laptop use and impact in the context of changing home and school access. San Francisco, Ca: Author. Available: http://rockman.com/projects/laptop/laptop3exec.htm#top Sandholtz, J., Ringstaff, C., and Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. NY: Teachers College, Columbia University. SEIRTEC (Southeast and Islands Regional Technology Education Consortium). [Online] Available: http://www.serve.org/seir-tec/ Simpson, C. (1999). Internet relay chat. ERIC Digest [Online]. Accessed: http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed425743.html. Simpson, C. (1996). The school librarian's role in the electronic age. ERIC Digest [Online]. Accessed: http://ericir.syr.edu/ithome/digests/librole.html. Smith, I. (1993). An investigation into students' perceptions of the learning envrionment provided by hypermedia tolls in an interdisciplinary high school course of studies. PhD Dissertation, University of Oregon. U.S. Department of Education (1999, July). The Secretarys conference on educational technology: Evaluating the effectiveness of educational technology [Online]. Available: http://www.ed.gov/Technology/TechConf/1999/. Wirt, J. (November 1999). Indicator of the month: Internet access in public and private schools [Online]. Washington DC: NCES. Accessed: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000002 |