ISTE Home
About ISTE
Advocacy
Advocacy Events
Advocacy Toolkit
Ed Tech Action Network
Policy
Washington Notes
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
1999
1998
1997
Public Policy Advocate of the Year Award
Educator Resources
Membership
NECC
NETS
Career Center
News & Events
Professional Development
Publications
Research
Store

Printer Friendly
Members Only Members Only

   Washington 
Notes

WASHINGTON NOTES
News of U.S. educational technology policy and legislation
Compiled and edited by Leslie Harris, Jee Hang Lee, and Ghani Raines.
© ISTE, 2000.


-------------------------------


ACTION 
ALERT

Help Stop Federal Filtering Mandate


-------------------------------

We urgently need your help to remove the filtering and monitoring mandate from the Labor, Health, Human Services and Education Appropriations bill.

The Labor HHS conference committee included mandatory filtering and monitoring language in the Labor, Health, Human Services and Education Appropriations bill, which would require the following:

Education institutions receiving Title III technology funds for the purchase of computers or to pay costs associated with Internet access must install and use technology to block or filter access to child pornography or material that is harmful to minors or obscene. Education institutions that do not comply will lose their Title III funding.

Schools and libraries receiving E-Rate funds must select and use technology that blocks access by minors to obscenity, child pornography, and “any other material that the school or library determines to be inappropriate for minors.”

Schools and libraries receiving E-Rate funds must monitor online activities of minors by either supervisory or technological means.

Schools and libraries must implement use policies that address Internet access to matter inappropriate for minors; in addition, they must hold at least one public community meeting on the plan. (This is true for independent schools too.)

To persuade U.S. Congress and the Administration to remove the filtering mandate, we need examples of current Internet access policies and practices at risk of being overturned if the language in the Appropriations bill becomes the law.

We need stories from schools and school districts that describe how you deal with student access to “inappropriate material,” whether through technological means, acceptable use policies, or a combination of methods. The stories need to describe your decision-making process and the effects that a broad federal mandate would have on your school or school district.

If you can help, PLEASE send us the following information about your school or school district and its Internet use policies and practices:

Description of Current Policy, including how it was developed:

  • Description of your school or district’s Internet use plan.
  • Participants in the Internet use decision-making process (e.g., school board members, teachers, parents, and students)
  • Did you hold a public hearing and/or accept parental input?
  • Has your plan been successful?

Expenses Associated with Your Current Plan:

  • If your school uses filtering or other technological methods, what is the total cost of operation? Include one-time and ongoing costs for the filtering service and costs for training teachers and/or other professional staff.
  • Were other costs associated with the filtering, such as updating your local area network (LAN) or the computers?
  • If your school does not use filtering, please estimate the cost for complying with this mandate.
  • Do you monitor students’ Internet usage? If yes, do you monitor physically or through the network? What is the total cost associated with monitoring?
  • If you do not currently monitor, please estimate the cost to comply with this mandate, either monitoring physically or by using a monitoring tool installed on your LAN.

Impact of New Federal Filtering & Monitoring Mandates on Your Plan:

  • What changes would you have to make to become compliant with a federal mandate requiring filtering on all Internet-accessible computers?
  • What changes would you have to make to monitor all student Internet use?
  • In your estimation, how expensive would it be to comply with these mandates?
  • Do you think these mandates are as effective or educationally valuable as your current plan? If not, why not?

Contact Information
We also need to know if we can use your name and/or the name of your school or school district when using this information. If you need us to describe your school/district in less specifically identifiable terms (e.g., a suburban school district in southern California), please let us know how to describe it.

ACTION NEEDED

Congress and the Administration are scheduled to begin negotiations very soon on the final bill. We have to support those who are seeking to eliminate this mandate with concrete information and examples from the field. Please send the information to Jee Hang Lee in ISTE’s Washington, DC, office, jhlee@lharris.com, or fax it to 202.478.6171. The information will then be circulated to U.S. Congressional offices and the Administration.

 


Prepared by Leslie Harris, Jee Hang Lee, and Ghani Raines
On behalf of the International Society for Technology in Education.
© ISTE, 2000

Customer Service: iste@iste.org   1.800.336.5191   1.541.302.3777 (Int'l)   1.541.302.3778 (fax)
Visit the ISTE Career Center for educational technology jobs, resources, and listings. Copyright 1997-