ISTE Home
About ISTE
Advocacy
Advocacy Events
Advocacy Toolkit
Ed Tech Action Network
Policy
Washington Notes
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
1999
1998
1997
Public Policy Advocate of the Year Award
Educator Resources
Membership
NECC
NETS
Career Center
News & Events
Professional Development
Publications
Research
Store

Printer Friendly
Members Only Members Only

   Washington 
Notes

WASHINGTON NOTES
News of U.S. educational technology policy and legislation
Compiled and edited by Leslie Harris, Jee Hang Lee, and Ghani Raines.
© ISTE, 2000.

October 2000 Contents

 

-------------------------------


To Top Congress and White House Postpone Budget Negotiations
-------------------------------

House Republican leaders stepped away from a tentative agreement between Congressional and White House negotiators on the Labor, Health, Human Services and Education Appropriations bill (H.R. 4577) because of concerns about the overall funding level and a dispute over an ergonomics rule from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The new workforce ergonomics rule, opposed by business groups, is meant to reduce repetitive-motion and other work-related injuries.

The tentative deal would have increased education funding by $7.4 billion dollars to a total of $43 billion. This would have translated into a 21% funding increase over the FY00 budget. Education technology would have received more than $860 million, an increase of more than $80 million from FY00.

With this latest failure to reach agreement, Congress and the White House have reached an impasse. The President and Congressional leaders now indicate that they will wait until after the election to resume negotiations. The “lame-duck” session is expected to begin on November 14th.

On November 1, the Senate unanimously passed a long-term continuing resolution keeping government funding at the FY00 funding level. House leaders have rejected the Senate’s proposal to a long-term continuing resolution. The House is expected to pass one-day continuing resolutions through the election. Meanwhile, the Senate is expected to pass continuing resolution by voice vote or unanimous consent.

 

-------------------------------


To Top Filtering Mandate Shelved with Budget Bill
-------------------------------

With Congress postponing consideration of the Labor HHS Appropriations bill until Nov. 14th, the future of the federal filtering mandate contained therein has also been placed on hold. The delay has given hope to groups opposing the filtering mandate that it may yet be removed or its language replaced with more conciliatory language. Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Jack Reed (D-RI) and Jim Jeffords (R-VT) have been outspoken critics of the bill, and circulated a “Dear Colleague” letter urging appropriators to not support its inclusion in the spending bill. Also, a broad coalition of civil liberties, education, technology (including ISTE), parent and conservative organizations, continues to fight against the amendment, sponsored by Sens. John McCain (R-AZ), Rick Santorum (R-PA), and Rep. Ernest Istook (R-OK). The bill combines the language of three formerly competing bills the members introduced separately and mandates the use of filtering software by all schools and libraries receiving E-rate funding or ESEA support.

 

-------------------------------


To 
Top Ruling on Digital Copyright Act Endangers Digital Fair Use
-------------------------------

One of the provisions in the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act most opposed by educators and librarians was Sec. 1201, which criminalized circumvention of a technological protection measure to view copyrighted content on the Internet. Opponents of the measure warned that the new law would lock up digital content and undermine fair use. Lawmakers promised a review of the impact of the provision on fair use and, if necessary, further exemptions to protect fair use. Now, after an extensive rulemaking at the U.S. Copyright Office, it appears that there will in fact be little protection for fair use of digital works. The Office recommended only two exceptions from the law, only for compiling lists of Web sites blocked by protection software and for computer or software malfunction.

This decision is a grave disappointment to educators, researchers, and librarians who had strongly urged broader exemptions from the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s restrictions against accessing copyright works protected by technological means. However, with the Copyright Office’s ruling, it appears that fair use will face further roadblocks online, paving the way for the undesirable “pay-per-use” environment that school and library groups have long fought. At least one group, the American Library Association, is considering requesting that the ruling be reconsidered and pursuing litigation.

As it stands now, the ruling is effective until October 28, 2003, when new rules will be enacted. Prior to October 2003, the Register of Copyrights will consider what classes of copyright works, if any, should be made exempt from the 1201 provision from October 2003 onwards.

For more information on the ruling and rulemaking process, please visit the Federal Register Web site: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2000_register&docid=00-27714-filed

 

-------------------------------


To 
Top COPA Commission Reports to Congress
-------------------------------

On October 20, the Commission on Child Online Protection (the COPA Commission) delivered a report to Congress that unanimously approves a series of recommendations, including significant improvements in both on- and offline public education aimed at making the Internet safe for children. The report also recommends increased enforcement of existing child pornography and obscenity laws and improved consumer resources, including an independent testing facility to evaluate various technological tools.

Additionally, the Commission cited and encouraged several “best practices” for both the adult online industry and the Internet Service Provider (ISP) industry. Significantly, the COPA Commission did not recommend that Congress enact any new legislation with respect to children and the Internet, and did not call for the mandatory use of Internet filtering and blocking technology in schools or libraries.

For further details, copies of the COPA Commission report, or information about the hearings the Commission held, go to www.copacommission.org.

 

-------------------------------


To 
Top E-Rate Update:
-------------------------------

Funding Year 4 Window Opening

The Form 471 filing window for Funding Year 4 (July 1, 2001–June 30, 2002) opened on Monday, November 6, at noon EST. The window will close Thursday, January 18, 2001 at 11:59 p.m. EST.

  • All manually submitted applications must meet the Jan. 18 postmark deadline.
  • Unlike Funding Year 3, all materials associated with Form 471 must also meet the Jan. 18 postmark deadline, including:
    • Form 471
    • Block 6 Certification for Form 471, with original signature by authorized person
    • All Item 21 attachments
    • Block 6 Certification of Form 470 filed for Funding Year 4

Funding Wave Update: Wave 26 Released Oct. 27

Funding Wave 26 was released October 27, bringing the total amount dispensed in Funding Year 3 to more than $2 billion in 26,041 awards. For a full breakdown of discount awards through Wave 26, visit: www.sl.universalservice.org/funding/y3/national.asp#quick.

Eligible Services List Updated

Clarifications of services eligible for funding have been added to the Eligible Services List. A new list reflecting additional changes will be posted early in the Form 471 application window for Funding Year 4.

Customer Service: iste@iste.org   1.800.336.5191   1.541.302.3777 (Int'l)   1.541.302.3778 (fax)
Visit the ISTE Career Center for educational technology jobs, resources, and listings. Copyright 1997-