|

|
ISTE Washington Notes
News of U.S. educational technology policy and legislation, posted
as a service of ISTE, the International Society for Technology in Education.
Copyright © 2006 ISTE
Guide to acronyms
used in Washington Notes
|
July 2006 Contents
Major ISTE Advocacy Events and Activity in July
ISTEs National Educational Computing Conference (NECC) hosted the first ever
Education Technology Action Network (ETAN) booth in July. With a prominent location
in the main pavilion, the ETAN booth was seen by nearly 12,000 registered attendees,
who were encourage to send e-mail letters to their congressional delegation.
Attendees were eager to make their voices heard, lining up to do their part
to save the Enhancing Education Through Technology Program (EETT). Altogether,
the ETAN booth generated 2,000 letters during the 3-day conference.
The timing couldnt have been more effective, says Hilary Goldmann,
ISTEs director of government affairs. The Senate began working on its
education funding bill just a week after the close of NECC, and these letters
played an important role in the outcome of the Senate action.
ISTE played a key role in another high profile advocacy event just after the
close of NECC. As co-chairs of the National Coalition for Technology in Education
and Trainings Mission Critical Campaign (MCC), ISTE and the Software and
Information Industry Association (SIIA), hosted a media event at the U.S. Capitol
on July 12. ISTE CEO Don Knezek and SIIA President Ken Wasch spoke on behalf
of education technology funding and delivered a petition signed by 7,000 educators
and other stakeholders to Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) and Representatives
Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI) and Ron Kind (D-WI).
Also delivering powerful messages from the field were educators Nina Hansen,
Immediate Past President of ISTEs affiliate, the Connecticut Educational
Computing Association, and Mary Jane Mielke, a district technology coordinator
from Michigan and member of ISTEs affiliate the Michigan Association of
Computer Users in Learning. The clear message was that EETT funding is critical
for U.S. competitiveness in a global economy and for schools to meet NCLB mandates.
More about this event here.
Later in Julyand with about 8,000 letters of support for EETT
in handISTEs Director of Government Affairs Hilary Goldmann made
an additional round of lobbying visits to key Senate staff. These Hill staffers
were keenly aware of EETT, says Goldmann, and have been hearing from back
home about the program. The letters work well, she says, and
reinforce ISTEs message about the critical importance and value of the EETT
program.
top
Senate Funds EETT at $272M, Reframes as Competitiveness
Issue
In mid-July, Senate appropriators approved the FY07 Labor, HHS and Education
Appropriations bill, agreeing to provide $272 million in funding for EETT, the
same amount it received last year. This decision represents a major win for
EETT, which the Administration had proposed to eliminate entirely in its FY07
Budget Proposal and the House Appropriations Committee had zeroed-out in its
version of the same bill.
Moreover, the Senate bill includes EETT in its competitiveness package,
indicating that the Senate views the program as a crucial component in the overall
Competitiveness Initiative.
top
ISTE CEO Press Statement
ISTE applauds the Senate subcommittee for recognizing EETTs direct connection
to our nations competitiveness and funding it at $272 million, said ISTE
CEO Don Knezek in a statement released to the press July 19.
As we have stated all along, EETT is uniquely positioned to help ensure
that Americas students achieve academically and possess the requisite skills
to compete successfully in the global economy. While we understand the financial
constraints that led the Subcommittee to support level funding the program,
ISTE will continue to seek the restoration of funding for EETT to its FY 05
funding level and will continue the battle to turn back the House action to
eliminate the program.
top
Other Key Programs Funded by Senate Action
Other technology programs also fared better in the Senate version of this legislation.
The Statewide Longitudinal Data program received $38 million, a 50+% increase
over last years final figure and a $3 million increase over what the House
Appropriations Committee approved.
The Star Schools program, a distance-learning program that both the Administration
and the House sought to eliminate, also received $10 million in the Senates
bill.
top
A First Step toward Full Approval of Funds
While encouraging for EETTs supporters, this action by Senate appropriators
is only a first step. Neither the House nor Senate have scheduled time to debate
and pass their respective bills. And even when they do approve their respective
versions, a House and Senate Conference Committee must meet to negotiate the
differences between the two appropriation bills, emerging ultimately with a
compromise bill that each chamber must pass and the President sign.
With few legislative days remaining for Congress, and great dissatisfaction
among Democrats and some Republicansincluding Labor, HHS and Education
Subcommittee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA)over low funding
levels for social programs, final action on this bill may not occur until November.
Compromise Will Be Difficult
Serious hurdles remain. Chief among these are the tight spending caps Congress
has to work with in reaching a compromise funding bill.
As shown in the chart below, EETT received no funding in the House version
but level funding in the Senate version. The House Appropriations Committee
provided Title V, Innovative programs, with a $51 million increase over last
year and increased Math and Science Partnerships funding by more than $40 million;
the Senate eliminated all funding for Title V and provided the Math and Science
Partnerships program with only a $13 million increase. Both House and Senate
appropriators agreed that the Teacher Quality block grant should sustain some
reduction this year, but the House cut far deeper, removing 10% of its funds,
whereas the Senate cut less than 5% of its funds over last year. Finally, even
Title I funding, which had received steady increases over the past 5 years,
received only level funding in the House and Senate versions of this bill. All
of these differences must be rectified in conference, likely leading to a program
vs. program battle in the upcoming conference.
|
|
FY06 Appropriated
|
FY 07 House Comm.
|
FY 07 Senate Comm.
|
|
Title I
|
$12.7 billion |
$12.7 billion |
$12.7 billion |
|
Teacher Quality
|
$2.9 billion |
$2.6 billion |
$2.75 billion |
|
EETT
|
$272.3 million |
$0 |
$272.3 million |
|
Reading First
|
$1.029 billion |
$1.029 billion |
$1.029 billion |
|
Innovative Programs, Title V
|
$99 million |
$150 million |
$0 |
|
State Data Program
|
$24.8 million |
$35 million |
$38 million |
|
Star Schools
|
$14.9 million |
$0 |
$10 million |
|
Ready to Teach
|
$10.9 million |
$0 |
$10 million |
|
High School Reform
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
Math Now Programs
|
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
Math/Science Partnerships
|
$182 million |
$225 million |
$195 million |
top
E-Rate Bill Stalls in Senate
Since the Senate Commerce Committee approved S. 2686, a bill to overhaul telecommunications
law including the E-Rate, the bills progress has stalled. Senate Commerce
Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-AK) has indicated that Senate Majority Leader
Bill Frist (R-TN), who controls floor time in the Senate, will not allow any
bills onto the Senate floor without an assurance that the sponsor has 60 votes
to end debate and prevent filibusters. Senator Frist must be cautious about
floor time because few legislative days remain in this session and those that
do will be occupied with debate on FY07 appropriations bills. According to all
reports, Senator Stevens is working hard to secure the 60 votes necessary to
move S.2686 to the floor but admits that hes still short of that figure.
At this point, the Senate will not consider S. 2686 until at least September.
The bill contains a number of key E-Rate provisions supported by ISTE, including:
- Permanently exempting universal service and the E-Rate from the Anti Deficiency
Act (ADA)an arcane accounting standards that, when applied to the E-Rate
in 2004, caused the program to shutdown for three months.
- Establishing a system to sanction applicants and providers who knowingly
and repeatedly violate program rules.
- Establishing performance measures that would measure applicant progress
towards connectivity goals.
The House bill contains no E-Rate provisions and, even if S.2686 were to pass
the Senate, the Senates E-Rate language would have to survive a House-Senate
Conference.
top
FCC Assesses VoIP to Support ERate
As the Senates efforts on a telecommunications overhaul ground to a halt,
the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was forced to increase the amount
of money wireless providers pay into the universal service fund (which supports
the E-Rate). Also, for the first time ever, the FCC assessed universal service
fees on Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers in order to shore up the
fund.
The Commission took this action because the universal service fund, which is
funded through a fee assessed on the interstate and international fees of telephone
companies, has endured steady erosion in its revenue base as a result of declining
profits in the long distance industry. This revenue decline has put pressure
on the fund because, at the same time, the overall fund has grown by 50% between
2000 and 2005. E-Rate funds have been subsidizing rural telecommunications companies
so they can provide affordable service to rural consumers. Without a permanent
fix by Congress or the Commission, the stability of the E-Rate and all of universal
service could be jeopardized.
In its Order of June 27, the Commission announced that it would raise the
assessment on wireless providers for universal service from 28.5% of overall
revenues to 37.1% and that it would establish a universal service fee for
VoIP providers of 64.9% of revenues.
However, it is difficult to know with certainty whether individual wireless
and VoIP calls are actually interstate calls. So the FCC estimates the percentage
of interstate revenues from both industries in order to assess universal
service fees on those industries. The Commission explained that it had increased
the fees on these industries because wireless and VoIP revenues and subscriber
levels have exploded in the past five years. According to the Order, wireless
provider revenues grew from $70 billion in 2000 to $122 billion in 2004
and subscriber levels grew from 101 million to 181 million during that same
time. Wireless subscribers today number approximately 208 million. The Order
also notes that VoIP subscriptions have been steadily trending upwards,
standing at 4.2 million as of the end of 2005.
On July 24th, the FCC announced that initial comments on the latest version
of the Eligible Services list must be submitted to the Commission by August
4th, with reply comments due on August 14th. Go to the following URL to
see the proposed FY07 Eligible Services list: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC06109A1.pdf.
Join the Ed Tech Action Network!
If educational technology issues are important to you, then please join the
Ed Tech Action Network at http://www.EdTechActionNetwork.org.
This online advocacy tool will allow you to easily send important messages to
your Representative and Senators, learn more about timely education technology
issues, and receive tips for communicating with elected officials. Your voice
is critical for impacting the decisions of policy-makers.
From the Washington, D.C.
Office of Bernstein Strategy Group
*************************
The following message is posted as a service of ISTE,
the International Society for Technology in Education.
This message may not be reposted without this header.
Copyright © 2006 ISTE
| Washington Notes, July, 2006 |
|