ISTE Home
About ISTE
Advocacy
Educator Resources
Membership
Affiliates
All-Inclusives
Awards and Recognition
ISTE 100
Join or Renew
Member Campaigns
Member Central
Member Networking
My Profile
Podcasts
Special Interest Groups
SIG Newsletter
Join a SIG
SIG1to1 (1 to 1 Computing)
SIGAdmin (Administrators)
SIGCT (Computing Teachers)
SIGDE (Digital Equity)
SIGHC (Handheld Computing)
SIGILT (Innovative Learning Technologies)
SIGIVC (Interactive Video Conferencing)
SIGMS (Media Specialists)
SETSIG (Special Education Technology)
SIGTC (Technology Coordinators)
SIGTE (Teacher Educators)
SIGTel (Telelearning)
Join SIGTel
SIGTel Bulletin
About
Archive
2008-2009
2007-2008
2006-2007
2005-2006
2004-2005
2003-2004
2002-2003
2001-2002
Submission Guidelines
SIGTel Officers
SIGTel Online Learning Award
SIGAE (Arts Educators)
SIGDS (Digital Storytelling)
SIGGS (Games and Simulations)
SIGIS (Independent Schools)
SIGMT (Music and Technology)
SIGTAP (Technology in Afterschool Programs)
Volunteer
NECC
NETS
Career Center
News & Events
Professional Development
Publications
Research
Store

Printer Friendly

Standing in the Middle
From a Variety of Perspectives

Tuiren A. Bratina and Debra K. Abbott
University of North Florida

Note: The video and audio files require RealPlayer. Read the RealOne Player instructions to play the audio files.

Children develop their earliest ideas about statistics from hearing others use the words in conversation. Young children have a premathematical sense of these concepts as indicated by their use of vocabulary words such as typical, normal, okay, most, and middle (Watson & Moritz, 1999, p.18). We created a setting familiar to children (arranging people according to their heights) so we could introduce and expand on children's understanding of median. We used one animated graphic. Next we facilitated their increased understanding of median by building on the scenario depicted by this learning object. We believe learning objects can be used to introduce and expand conceptual understanding. As you read this article, be thinking of similar computer experiences your students can build on to attain understanding of the concept of your choice.

The concepts of median and mode should be introduced before the mean (Mokros & Russell, 1995; Russell & Mokros, 1996; Watson & Moritz, 1999). Mokros and Russell explain that "premature introduction of the algorithm for finding the mean may cause a short circuit in the reasoning of some children (p.37)." Their research reported that middle school students commonly overly rely on the algorithm, misapply it or create their own meaningless algorithms, and do not consider whether answers make sense in reality (p. 28-31).

Initially teachers should avoid exercises that deal with statistics in an abstract way. Instead teachers should have children use learning tiles, balancing sticks, play money, or graph construction. Those activities will help to emphasize conceptual understanding and inquiry into what constitutes representativeness of a variety of data sets (Meyer, Browning, & Channell, 1995). By exposure to mean, median, and mode in a variety of contexts through many years of schooling, students will not only be able to successfully choose an appropriate measure for a specific context, they will eventually be able to use these measures to answer more complex questions.

We too believe that the development of children's knowledge of the concepts of measures of central tendency should begin with the median. Our case study will discuss instructional strategies used to present the concept of median to Brock and Taylor, rising fifth graders who have experience using computers.

A Case Study

In July, Brock and Taylor demonstrated their skills to educators who were testing a variety of digital learning objects. This article is an account of Brock's and Taylor's actions and interactions as they were presented a lesson about the median.

The boys first viewed an animation (Exhibit A at http://www.unf.edu/~tbratina/hec/example/mediananimation.htm) depicting five young people of unequal heights. This animation is a series of frames showing the pictured children being arranged according to their heights, from shortest to tallest. The graphic shows the individual standing in the middle being singled out. Her height is the median height.

Next the boys were asked to mimic what they saw on the computer screen. There were five people in the room. Brock and Taylor positioned themselves and rearranged the others in the line-up so that all five stood shortest to tallest. When asked how that related to the median, Taylor said, "It's not the shortest and it's not the tallest." A probing question directed to Taylor was, "So Brock's height is the median? He's not the shortest and he's not the tallest." Taylor knew that was incorrect and correctly identified the person in the middle of the line-up of persons standing in ascending order of height. She was asked how tall she was. Five feet six inches. The statement was made, "Five feet six inches is the median height." Exhibit B at http://stream.unf.edu:8080/ramgen/tbratina/medianpt1.rm is a video of this experience. (To view the video, download the free RealPlayer from www.real.com.)

Next one of the adults recited nine numbers, the order being neither all increasing nor all decreasing (9, 100, 8, 4, 1, 4, 7, 9, 5).

paper and pencil finding median paper and pencil finding median

Brock and Taylor "collaborated" to find the median. The youngsters used an algorithm that essentially mimicked the rearrangement procedure they had performed to get a line-up of people of ascending heights (Exhibit C at http://stream.unf.edu:8080/ramgen/tbratina/medianpt2.rm).

Brock and Taylor easily moved from semi-concrete (computer animation) to concrete (human line-up) procedures. They were also able to apply the semi-concrete and concrete experiences to correctly arrive at an abstract process (using only symbols).

Fourteen days later (and with no intervention) Brock was asked about the median. At first he did not know how to describe the median. So the interviewer asked Brock, "Can you tell me the median of the following numbers: 9, 100, 5, 3, 7?" Brock needed to be reminded that he had studied mathematics problems two weeks earlier. Brock beamed as he partially recalled the algorithm. "5" was Brock's answer. When asked why, Brock declared five was the middle number. Pausing, he then went through what appeared to be a mental exercise. "Seven," he recanted. Brock's justification for stating the median was seven was correct.

 

 

Reflecting on the Students' Work

There are two main points we would like to make relative to Brock's and Taylor's learning experiences. First, a symbiotic relationship between digital and non-digital resources seems to have been operating. There are so many discussions that revolve around technology versus other instructional strategies. Graeme Wilson (2001) states, "In their enthusiasm for using technology, educators often overlook non-digital activities that work just fine to convey learning and can perhaps better adapt to different learning situations." This learning instance illustrates that using computers in conjunction with other instructional techniques provides a solid foundation for the two children's understanding of median. This does not just happen. We encourage teachers to help students make these connections by using a variety of complementary instructional tools. Teachers need to point out to the learners that the experiences are simply different representations of the "same" problem.

Secondly, teachers need to plan ahead for the student to move toward concept attainment. The digital learning object was selected because there were an odd number of children pictured in the animation. The identical number of humans was used in the line-up. An odd number of elements in the set of numbers were presented for the abstract portion of the tasks. Caution was also taken that there would be no ties. During initial concept formation the most basic situation is presented.

Notice that the follow-up was truly action research! The noise in the background suggests that this was a natural setting. Actually the noise did not bother Brock or the interviewer because they have grown accustomed to it. Therefore, no criticism will be made about the setting. However, there is a criticism regarding the selection of the numbers in the follow-up session with Brock. There was nothing mathematically improper about choosing "5" as one of the numbers in the set, but pedagogically speaking, that number should not be used because there were five numbers in the set. It frequently causes confusion. When someone says "five," it is difficult to detect when the person is talking about the number of elements in the set or the element itself.

We want to add that after we concluded our "case study," Brock and Taylor reported that during the first two weeks of their fifth grade year, the teacher taught the class about the median. The boys told us that they helped the teacher explain how to find the median! We believe we established a "readiness" for learning this concept in their school setting.

Extensions

The same processes could be used for concept attainment of the other measures of central tendency. For example, youngsters could have the concept of average (Exhibit D at http://www.unf.edu/%7Etbratina/hec/example/averageanimationelemschool.htm) presented to them at a semi-concrete level. They could then be given pennies to distribute to five humans exactly as the pennies in the animation were distributed. The physical actions to build the algorithm for finding the average would be acted out by the students. After students go through the semi-concrete and concrete operations, they can be presented a set of several numbers (the sum of which is divisible by the number of elements in the set). The teacher needs to enunciate the connection among the concrete, semi-concrete, and abstract episodes. It is not normally readily apparent to the learners.

The teacher must also design initial experiences so that participants receive an equal number of pennies and there are no remaining pennies. The teacher should advise children that they will encounter more complicated scenarios as they master the basic understanding of mean and can correctly compute the mean.

The scenario is reusable for the third measure of central tendency. They could view animated pictures on a computer screen. The animation would show more than one person of the same height. Then the students could select the mode of the heights of the real-people in a line-up. After the semi-concrete and concrete phases, a set of numbers would be presented and the students would have to produce the mode from that set. The teacher again needs to carefully select the elements of the set (be they digital figures, or humans, or numbers) so that the students are introduced to the basic notion of mode. Once grasped, the teacher can help the children transition to a more complex set of elements.

Challenges

This article is not about statistical indices. It is about using a variety of instructional strategies in stimulating and effective ways for developing understanding of a concept, procedure, and application.

The teacher and learner(s) are the central components of the experience. The teacher must identify the learning objects that can and should be connected to construct the meanings of the topic(s) to be studied. The teacher must also determine the order in which to present the instructional strategies. For example, we chose to do the semi-concrete level (pictures on the computer) before the concrete level (human line-up). This was a practical decision. There was little need for direction after Brock and Taylor saw the computer animation. They easily copied the process. Teachers should analyze the situation to help determine what the best order appears to be.

So it is evident that the teacher's role is crucial in this process and cannot and will not be replaced by non-human objects that the teacher and student(s) use to move toward concept, procedural, or skill attainment.

References

Meyer, R., Browning, C. & Channell, D. (1995). Expanding students' conceptions of the arithmetic mean. School Science and Mathematics, 95(3), 114 -17.

Mokros, J. & Russell, S. (1995). Children's concepts of average and representativeness. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 20-39.

Russell, S. & Mokros, J. (1996). Research into practice: What do children understand about average? Teaching Children Mathematics, 2(6), 360-364.

Watson, J. & Moritz, J. (1999). The development of concepts of average. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 21(4), 15-39.

Wilson, G. (September, 2001). The promise of online education: El Dorado or fool's gold? From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal, 21(1). Available online: http://www.fno.org/sept01/online.html

Customer Service: iste@iste.org   1.800.336.5191   1.541.302.3777 (Int'l)   1.541.302.3778 (fax)
Visit the ISTE Career Center for educational technology jobs, resources, and listings.