ISTE Home
About ISTE
Advocacy
Educator Resources
Membership
ISTE 2010
NETS
Career Center
News & Events
Professional Development
Publications
Bookstore
Catalog
JCTE—Journal of Computing in Teacher Education
JRTE—Journal of Research on Technology in Education
About JRTE
Editorial Staff
Past Issues
Volume 42
Volume 41
Number 4: Summer 2009
Number 3: Spring 2009
Number 2: Winter 2008
Number 1: Fall 2008
Volume 40
Volume 39
Volume 38
Volume 37
Volume 36
Volume 35
Volume 34
Volume 33
Volume 32
Volume 31
Volume 30
Volume 29
Volume 28
Volume 27
Volume 26
Submission Guidelines
Become a Reviewer
L&L—Learning & Leading with Technology
Permissions & Reprints
SIG Publications
Submission Information
Research
Store

Printer Friendly
Members Only Members Only

A Comparison of Traditional Homework to Computer-Supported Homework

Michael Mendicino
West Virginia University

Leena Razzaq and Neil T. Heffernan
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Abstract

This study compared learning for fifth grade students in two math homework conditions. The paper-and-pencil condition represented traditional homework, with review of problems in class the following day. The Web-based homework condition provided immediate feedback in the form of hints on demand and step-by-step scaffolding. We analyzed the results for students who completed both the paper-and-pencil and the Web-based conditions. In this group of 28 students, students learned significantly more when given computer feedback than when doing traditional paper-and-pencil homework, with an effect size of .61. The implications of this study are that, given the large effect size, it may be worth the cost and effort to give Web-based homework when students have access to the needed equipment, such as in schools that have implemented one-to-one computing programs.

Members Only Download the full article (PDF)

Contributors

Michael Mendicino is a doctoral student in the Department of Technology, Learning, and Culture at West Virginia University. He specializes in instruction for students with mild learning disabilities.

Leena Razzaq is a PhD student in the Department of Computer Science at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. She is interested in studying how different tutoring strategies in intelligent tutoring systems affect students of varying abilities.

Neil T. Heffernan is an assistant professor of computer science at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Heffernan holds a PhD in computer science and specializes in building intelligent tutoring systems.

Contact

Michael Mendicino
PO Box 6122, 506 Allen Hall,
West Virginia University,
Morgantown, WV, 26506-6122,
Phone: 304.293.3879
E-mail: mmendic1@mix.wvu.edu

Leena Razzaq
Department of Computer Science, Fuller Labs 312, Worcester Polytechnic Institute,
100 Institute Road,
Worcester, MA 01609-2280,
Fax: 508.831.5776,
E-mail: leenar@cs.wpi.edu

Neil T. Heffernan
Department of Computer Science, Fuller Labs 237, Worcester Polytechnic Institute,
100 Institute Road,
Worcester, MA 01609-2280,
Phone: 508.831.5569,
Fax: 508.831.5776,
E-mail: nth@cs.wpi.edu

Copyright 2009, (International Society for Technology in Education). All rights reserved.

 

Customer Service: iste@iste.org   1.800.336.5191   1.541.302.3777 (Int'l)   1.541.302.3778 (fax)
Visit the ISTE Career Center for educational technology jobs, resources, and listings. Copyright 1997-