ISTE Home
About ISTE
Advocacy
Educator Resources
Membership
NECC
NETS
Career Center
News & Events
Professional Development
Publications
Bookstore
Catalog
JCTE—Journal of Computing in Teacher Education
JRTE—Journal of Research on Technology in Education
About JRTE
Editorial Staff
Past Issues
Volume 41
Volume 40
Volume 39
Volume 38
Volume 37
Volume 36
Volume 35
Volume 34
Volume 33
Volume 32
Number 4: Summer 2000
Number 3: Spring 2000
Number 2: Winter 1999-2000
Number 1: Fall 1999
Volume 31
Volume 30
Volume 29
Volume 28
Volume 27
Volume 26
Submission Guidelines
L&L—Learning & Leading with Technology
Permissions & Reprints
SIG Publications
Submission Information
Research
Store

Printer Friendly

Journal of Research on Technology in 

Education Edited by Dr. David J. Ayersman, Mary Washington
College, and Dr. W. Michael Reed, New York University

formerly Journal of Research on Computing in Education

JRTE, Volume 32, Number 3, Spring 2000
How Teachers and Parents View Classroom Learning Environments: An Exploratory Study

Barry N. Scott
Auburn University

Robert D. Hannafin
College of William and Mary

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to examine teachers’ and parents’ beliefs across several dimensions of the classroom learning environment (CLE). The sample consisted of 132 teachers and 809 parents in a public school district in a southeastern suburban university town. Participants responded to a survey that was designed to measure beliefs along a continuum from “consistent with the traditional classroom” to “consistent with the reformed classroom” about four components of the school learning environment: assessment, knowledge, student role, and pedagogy. Results indicated that parents held more traditional views than teachers about all four of the components, significantly in regard to knowledge and content. Among teachers, a separate analysis revealed that significant differences existed among grade-level groups on the pedagogy and student role components, while no differences existed among experience levels. These findings have important implications for instructional designers, curriculum developers, and school reformers.

Contributors

Barry N. Scott is a doctoral candidate in instructional technology at Auburn University.

Dr. Robert D. Hannafin is an assistant professor in curriculum and instruction at The College of William & Mary.

Address: Barry N. Scott, 2685 Ruth Rd., Arab, AL 35016; scottbn@mindspring.com.

Members Only Download the full article (PDF, 315 KB, PDF Instructions)

Copyright © 2000, ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). All rights reserved.

Customer Service: iste@iste.org   1.800.336.5191   1.541.302.3777 (Int'l)   1.541.302.3778 (fax)
Visit the ISTE Career Center for educational technology jobs, resources, and listings.