ISTE Home
About ISTE
Advocacy
Educator Resources
Membership
NECC
NETS
Career Center
News & Events
Professional Development
Publications
Bookstore
Catalog
JCTE—Journal of Computing in Teacher Education
JRTE—Journal of Research on Technology in Education
About JRTE
Editorial Staff
Past Issues
Volume 42
Volume 41
Volume 40
Volume 39
Volume 38
Volume 37
Volume 36
Volume 35
Volume 34
Volume 33
Number 5: Summer 2001
Number 4: Summer 2001
Number 3: Spring 2001
Number 2: Winter 2000-2001
Number 1: Fall 2000
Volume 32
Volume 31
Volume 30
Volume 29
Volume 28
Volume 27
Volume 26
Submission Guidelines
Become a Reviewer
L&L—Learning & Leading with Technology
Permissions & Reprints
SIG Publications
Submission Information
Research
Store

Printer Friendly
Members Only Members Only

Journal of Research on 

Technology in Education

Edited by Dr. David J. Ayersman, Mary Washington College, and Dr. W. Michael Reed, New York University

formerly Journal of Research on Computing in Education

JRTE, Volume 33, Number 3, Spring 2001

Faculty Involvement in Planning for the Use and Integration of Instructional and Administrative Technologies

Margaret L. Rice
University of Alabama

Michael T. Miller
San Jose State University


Abstract

Colleges and universities increasingly rely on technology for both business and academic operations. Technology, in the form of hardware and software, has made higher education institutions more efficient and has expanded their reach and service areas to a global marketplace. The concern during this period of increasingly pervasive technology at higher education institutions is how to develop appropriate and adequate plans that maximize said technology in both administration and teaching. One method, used on a number of college campuses, involves the formation of faculty advisory groups and, at times, using faculty senate, forum, council, or similar organizations to provide opportunities for broad-based, inclusive decision making. The current study provides a report on a Delphi survey of 29 faculty senate leaders about how faculty should be involved in planning for the use of instructional and administrative technologies.

Web Resources

American universities [Online document]. (2001). Gainesville: College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, University of Florida. Available: www.clas.ufl.edu/CLAS/american-universities.html.

D. G. Oblinger. (1995). Educational alternatives based on communication, collaboration, and computers [Online document]. Armonk, NY: IBM. Available: www.unc.edu/citafs/iat-archive/publications/oblinger/oblinger.html.

T. L. Russell. (1999). The "No Significant Difference" phenomenon. Raleigh: North Carolina University. Available: http://nova.teleeducation.nb.ca/nosignificantdifference/.

Contributors

Margaret Rice, PhD, is an assistant professor of instructional technology at the University of Alabama. Her research focuses on the integration of technology into K–12 classrooms and teacher education programs.

Michael Miller, PhD, is the associate dean of the College of Education at San Jose University. He was previously an associate professor of higher education at the University of Alabama and has also served as the director of the research and development unit in Adult and Vocational Education at the University of Nebraska—Lincoln.

Address: Dr. Margaret L. Rice, College of Education, University of Alabama, Box 870302, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487; mrice@bamaed.ua.edu.


Download the full article (PDF, 73 KB, PDF Instructions)

Copyright © 2001, ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). All rights reserved.

Customer Service: iste@iste.org   1.800.336.5191   1.541.302.3777 (Int'l)   1.541.302.3778 (fax)
Visit the ISTE Career Center for educational technology jobs, resources, and listings. Copyright 1997-