ISTE Home
About ISTE
Advocacy
Educator Resources
Membership
NECC
NETS
Career Center
News & Events
Professional Development
Publications
Bookstore
Catalog
JCTE—Journal of Computing in Teacher Education
JRTE—Journal of Research on Technology in Education
About JRTE
Editorial Staff
Past Issues
Volume 42
Volume 41
Volume 40
Volume 39
Volume 38
Volume 37
Volume 36
Number 4: Summer 2004
Number 3: Spring 2004
Number 2: Winter 2003-2004
Number 1: Fall 2003
Volume 35
Volume 34
Volume 33
Volume 32
Volume 31
Volume 30
Volume 29
Volume 28
Volume 27
Volume 26
Submission Guidelines
Become a Reviewer
L&L—Learning & Leading with Technology
Permissions & Reprints
SIG Publications
Submission Information
Research
Store

Printer Friendly
Members Only Members Only

Journal of Research on 

Technology in Education

Edited by Dr. Lynne Schrum, University of Utah

formerly Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volume 36 Number 2 Winter 2003-2004

Research to Practice Online: Conditions that Foster Democracy, Community, and Critical Thinking In Computer-Mediated Discussions
Janice Fauske
University of South Florida
Suzanne E. Wade
University of Utah

Abstract
Although computer-mediated discussions (CMDs) have the potential to be ideal forums for fostering dialogue, research on listservs and in college composition classes has found that the discourse tends to be dominated by a few individuals, often men, and is sometimes abusive. In contrast, results of our study in a teacher education course revealed that both men and women used a range and a mix of discourse strategies. With a few exceptions, both men and women were inclusive, supportive, personalizing, receptive to others’ ideas, and attenuating. They were also willing to be critical and to challenge others’ assumptions, images, beliefs, and positions, which they usually prefaced with supportive and attenuating remarks. In addition, both men and women were equally likely to mock and exclude those who did not abide by the conventions of the group norms, although such comments were uncommon. Based on our own research and a review of the literature, we discuss what we learned and offer recommendations for instructors around four themes: planning, netiquette, the role of the instructor, and assessment.

Contributors
Janice Fauske is an associate professor in the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at the University of South Florida. Her teaching expertise includes reading in the content areas, teaching and learning theory, instructional improvement for school leaders, organizational communication and change in schools, and qualitative research methods. Research interests include the effects of collaborative governance and community building on teaching and learning in schools and university level teaching, including discourse analysis of online teaching.

Suzanne Wade is a professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning at the University of Utah, where she teaches courses in content area literacy, foundations of literacy, and reading strategies. Her research interests include interest and importance in text processing, inclusive education, case pedagogies in teacher education, and discourse analysis of online discussions. She has been supported in her work by a National Academy of Education Spencer Fellowship to conduct research in reading, and a Career Development Award from the Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation.

Members Only Download the full article (PDF, 120 KB, 19 seconds PDF Instructions)

Contact
Janice Fauske
5700 N. Tamiami Trail, PMC101
Sarasota, FL 34243
jfauske@sar.usf.edu

Suzanne Wade
1705 E. Campus Center Drive, Room 142
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Wade@ed.utah.edu

Copyright © 2003, ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). All rights reserved.

Customer Service: iste@iste.org   1.800.336.5191   1.541.302.3777 (Int'l)   1.541.302.3778 (fax)
Visit the ISTE Career Center for educational technology jobs, resources, and listings. Copyright 1997-