ISTE Home
About ISTE
Advocacy
Educator Resources
Membership
ISTE 2010
NETS
Career Center
News & Events
Professional Development
Publications
Bookstore
Catalog
JCTE—Journal of Computing in Teacher Education
JRTE—Journal of Research on Technology in Education
About JRTE
Editorial Staff
Past Issues
Volume 42
Volume 41
Volume 40
Number 4: Summer 2008
Number 3: Spring 2008
Number 2: Winter 2007-2008
Number 1: Fall 2007
Volume 39
Volume 38
Volume 37
Volume 36
Volume 35
Volume 34
Volume 33
Volume 32
Volume 31
Volume 30
Volume 29
Volume 28
Volume 27
Volume 26
Submission Guidelines
Become a Reviewer
L&L—Learning & Leading with Technology
Permissions & Reprints
SIG Publications
Submission Information
Research
Store

Printer Friendly
Members Only Members Only

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Edited by Dr. Lynne Schrum, George Mason University

formerly Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volume 40 Number 1 Fall 2007

Effect of Problem Solving Support and Cognitive Styles on Idea Generation: Implications for Technology-Enhanced

Slavi Stoyanov and Paul Kirschner
Open University of the Netherlands

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of two problem-solving techniques: (a) free-association with a direct reference to the problem, called shortly direct, and (b) free-association with a remote and postponed reference to the problem, called remote, on fluency and originality of ideas in solving ill-structured problems. The research design controlled for possible effects of cognitive style for problem-solving—adaptor versus innovator. The results showed that both groups significantly outscored a control group on fluency and originality. The remote group outperformed the direct and control groups on originality, but not on fluency. Innovators scored significantly better than adaptors in the control group on fluency, but not on originality. No significant difference was found between innovators and adaptors in both direct and remote groups. There was no statistical indication for an interaction effect between treatment and cognitive style. Based upon the results of this study, four implications for learning and instruction have been formulated for designing and developing technological arrangements for learning to solve ill-structured problems. These guidelines will support designers in developing instructional design solutions in educational technology applications.

Members Only Download the full article (PDF, 122 KB)

Contributors

Slavi Stoyanov is assistant professor at Educational Technology Expertise Center of Open University of the Netherlands. He has a PhD degree on Instructional Technology from University of Twente, The Netherlands. His prior research interest includes learning to solve ill-structured problems, cognitive mapping and individual differences in learning. (slavi.stoyanov@ou.nl.)

Paul A. Kirschner is professor of Educational Sciences at the Department of Pedagogical and Educational Sciences at Utrecht University (as well as head of the Research Centre Interaction and Learning and dean of the Research Master program Educational Sciences: Learning in Interaction) and professor of Educational Technology at the Educational Technology Expertise Center at the Open University of the Netherlands with a chair in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. He is an internationally recognized expert in his field. ( paul.kirschner@ou.nl and P.A.Kirschner@fss.uu.nl.)

Copyright 2007, (International Society for Technology in Education). All rights reserved.

Customer Service: iste@iste.org   1.800.336.5191   1.541.302.3777 (Int'l)   1.541.302.3778 (fax)
Visit the ISTE Career Center for educational technology jobs, resources, and listings. Copyright 1997-