ISTE Home
About ISTE
Advocacy
Educator Resources
Membership
ISTE 2010
NETS
Career Center
News & Events
Professional Development
Publications
Bookstore
Catalog
JCTE—Journal of Computing in Teacher Education
JDLTE-Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education
JRTE—Journal of Research on Technology in Education
L&L—Learning & Leading with Technology
About L&L
Advertise
Contact L&L
Current Issue
Past Issues
Volume 37 (2009-2010)
Volume 36 (2008-2009)
Volume 35 (2007-2008)
Volume 34 (2006-2007)
Volume 33 (2005-2006)
Volume 32 (2004-2005)
Volume 31 (2003-2004)
Volume 30 (2002-2003)
Volume 29 (2001-2002)
June-August (Summer)
May (No. 8)
April (No. 7)
March (No. 6)
February (No. 5)
December-January (No. 4)
November (No. 3)
October (No. 2)
September (No. 1)
Volume 28 (2000-2001)
Volume 27 (1999-2000)
Volume 26 (1998-1999)
Volume 25 (1997-1998)
Volume 24 (1996-1997)
Volume 23 (1995-1996)
Volume 22 (1995-1994)
Volume 21 (1994-1993)
Volume 19 (1992-1991)
Permissions & Reprints
Search L&L
Submit Articles
Permissions & Reprints
SIG Publications
Submission Information
Research
Store

Printer Friendly
Members Only Members Only

Featured Article

 

Arizona Classroom of Tomorrow Today Rubric for Evaluating Applications

Supplement to the article "Preparing Teacher Leaders" by Keith Wetzel

 

Name: _________________

School District: ___________________

Date: ______

Question Exemplary = 3 Good = 2 Average = 1 Score/
Comments
What is your vision for the use of technology in your classroom? Vision paints a picture that includes his or her educational philosophy, mission of school, and expectations for student achievement and motivation. Optional: Addresses standards. The vision statement is somewhat complete, but does not address one of the following: philosophy, mission of school, as well as expectations for student achievement. Vision statement is very general and leaves the impression that the applicant is unsure about the direction of his or her teaching and student outcomes.  
How will you integrate technology into your curriculum? Provide examples. Technology is integrated meaningfully in many of the curricular areas and class activities. Many different examples may demonstrate integration (e.g., projects, problem posing and solving, cooperative activities, presentations for real audiences). Technology is integrated to some extent in a meaningful way. Use is limited to one or two curricular areas. Technology appears to be absent or is appended to the examples in ways that are not relevant or do not make good use of the technology.  
How would you organize your classroom and students to make use of the computer stations? Describes organizational procedures including student rotation, student experts, small groups to solve problems and work together. Describes when and how technology would be used and the physical layout of the computers in the room. Describes use of computer lab (if available) as well as classroom computers. Provides a good general description but lacks some specific examples that help us understand classroom organization. Addresses some but not all of the areas discussed in the exemplary classroom. Very general indication of how students would be organized. Lacks specificity and details. No plan for students helping each other or guiding technology use. No indication about how many students would be using the stations at one time and what the remainder of the students would be doing. No plan for teaching large groups followed by small-group practice.  
What are your strongest technology skills? Has a working knowledge of many different software programs, including tools such as ClarisWorks (now AppleWorks), Microsoft Office, HyperStudio, and KidPix. Has taught computer application courses. Has a working knowledge of some software programs. Has offered inservice courses for district teachers on technology. Has a working knowledge of a few software programs. Has occasionally taught others to use technology.  
Support of the school principal Principal provides details about support and clearly defines how the goals of AZCOTT fit with their schoolÕs mission. Principal makes a strong commitment to ensuring the success of the project. Principal provides details about how AZCOTT will be supported, in terms of time, equipment, and personnel. Letter is missing or demonstrates only minimal support for AZCOTT classroom.  
Overall impression based on the clarity and substance of the remarks in the application. The application is clearly written and provides an overall impression that meaningful learning would take place in this classroom using technology as a tool. The application is somewhat clearly written. Some tool uses of technology are described. The overall impression is positive. The application may contain grammatical errors and lack cohesion. Less certain that technology would be used as a tool to make learning more dynamic and active.  

 

Copyright © 2001, ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). All rights reserved.

Customer Service: iste@iste.org   1.800.336.5191   1.541.302.3777 (Int'l)   1.541.302.3778 (fax)
Visit the ISTE Career Center for educational technology jobs, resources, and listings. Copyright 1997-